Background

Venice Body, a renowned brand in the skincare market, sought assistance from Aybee to boost sales by optimizing the pricing strategy of their best-seller product, “Self-Tan Drops.”

The primary objective was to identify the optimal price point among three options: the current price of 35.99€, a lower price of 24.99€, and an intermediate price of 32.99€. Additionally,Venice Body aimed to enhance the perceived value and competitive edge of their product against top competitors.

Übrigens: Alles rund um Marktforschung auf einen Blick gibt es in unserem Marktforschung ABC

Business Questions

  1. Should Venice Body decrease the price from 35.99€ to 24.99€ or 32.99€
  2. How can Venice Body improve their product to increase sales?
  3. How does Venice Body’s product compare to the main competitors?

Methodology

Aybee did a pricing test with three prices: 35.99€, 24.99€, and 32.99€. This test was done using a monadic method, meaning each person only saw one price to keep it fair. Here’s how it worked:

  • 600 people took part, with 200 people seeing each price.
  • Each person was shown just one price to avoid any bias.
  • This helped us see how different prices affect what people decide to buy.

By using this method, we got clear results about which price people liked best.

Kostenlos Kostenloses Stock Foto zu aussehen, behandlung, dame Stock-Foto

Results

The analysis revealed that maintaining the price at 35.99€ generated the highest revenue.Lowering the price did not lead to increased sales volume sufficient to compensate for the lower price, indicating that consumers valued the product’s quality at the higher price point.

Detailed Insights and Recommendations

From the test results, it became evident that a price reduction was not the optimal strategy.Instead, the focus should be on reinforcing the product’s superiority to justify its premium pricing. Here are the detailed insights and recommendations:

  1. Product Superiority - Consumers value the quality of Venice Body’s “Hyaluronic Self-Tan Drops,” noting its low margin of side effects, premium packaging, key benefits, and ease of integration with daily skincare routines. The product’s unique formulation with hyaluronic acid and its dual benefits of self-tanning and anti-aging make it stand out in the market.
  2. Marketing Communication - Emphasizing the anti-aging benefits and hyaluronic acid content in marketing materials can further enhance perceived value. Highlighting these aspects in the primary and secondary images can effectively communicate the product’s superiority.
  3. Visual Strategy - Venice Body has already initiated a change by updating the primary image to emphasize the anti-aging effect using a magnifying effect on the packaging. This strategy should be extended to include redesigned secondary images to showcase the ease of mixing the product with daily skincare routines and to highlight the product’s key benefits.
  4. Competitive Positioning - To strengthen competitive positioning, Venice Body can draw inspiration from competitors like Asam and Garnier, who effectively communicate product benefits through visual strategies. Through our test environment, we know the drivers and barriers for each competitive product. Weal ways know why consumers buy brand A, B, or C. Using this knowledge, Venice Body can refine their messaging and marketing strategies to better compete in the market.

ROI Case for Venice Body

Background

In the first week of May, Venice Body collaborated with Aybee to conduct a pricing A/B/C test and implement recommended changes to their product’s primary and secondary images. The aim was to optimize the pricing strategy and enhance the perceived value of their best-selling “Hyaluronic Self-Tan Drops.” This case study evaluates the return on investment (ROI) resulting from these interventions.

Investment and Costs

  • Total cost: 3.000€

Revenue Analysis

  • Revenue in March & April (Before the test): 52,252€
  • Revenue in June & July (After the test): 67,400€

The implementation of the recommended changes resulted in an increase of 15,148€ in revenue over the two months following the changes.

By investing 3.000€ in a pricing test and implementing strategic changes to their product images, Venice Body achieved a significant increase in revenue, resulting in an ROI of 405%within 2 months. This clearly demonstrates the value of the test and the effectiveness of Aybee’s recommendations in driving sales and enhancing the product’s market performance.

The success of this case study highlights the importance of continuous optimization and strategic marketing in achieving business goals. Venice Body’s collaboration with Aybee notonly optimized their pricing strategy but also provided valuable insights into consumer behavior and market positioning. This approach can serve as a blueprint for other companies looking to enhance their market performance and achieve high returns on investment.

🏔️ CHALLENGE

Naturbummler, a fast-growing outdoor brand, needed to determine which color variants to produce for their new children's Stand-Up Paddle Boards without risking costly inventory mistakes.

♟️ CLIENT'S HYPOTHESIS

The team assumed that all color variants would perform more or less similarly, making it difficult to prioritize production allocation.

💰 AYBEE TEST RESULTS

Color choice was a massive performance driver. Dark Blue generated 454% more purchase interest than Yellow when shown first, while Purple attracted attention but failed to convert. Gender-specific preferences were clear and actionable.

📊 ACTION POINTS:

Implement a data-driven production strategy: Prioritize Dark Blue and Light Blue in manufacturing, maintain Purple/Pink inventory for targeted demographics, and reduce Yellow production due to consistently low performance.

✅ OUTCOME:

We helped Naturbummler eliminate production guesswork and unlock up to 454% revenue potential. By testing before manufacturing, they reduced inventory risk, optimized production allocation, and maximized alignment between market demand and output.

Key Details

Client: NaturbummlerIndustry: Outdoor & Camping EquipmentMarket: GermanyProduct: Children's Stand-Up Paddle Boards (New Launch)Projected Revenue: €7 million in 2024Use Case: Pre-Production Color ValidationParticipants: 1,000 parents across Germany

The Full Story

The Pre-Production Dilemma

Naturbummler, founded in 2020, has quickly become one of Germany's fastest-growing outdoor brands with projected revenue of €7 million in 2024. As they prepared to launch a new line of children's Stand-Up Paddle Boards, they faced a critical decision that could make or break the product's success: which colors should they produce?

Manufacturing outdoor equipment requires significant upfront investment. Producing the wrong color mix could lead to:

  • Excess inventory of unpopular variants tying up capital
  • Stockouts of high-demand colors, leaving revenue on the table
  • Discounting pressure to clear slow-moving inventory
  • Missed market opportunity in a competitive category

The conventional approach would be to rely on internal assumptions, past experience, or competitor analysis. But Naturbummler knew that children's products—where parents make the purchasing decisions—require a different approach. Rather than guessing, they partnered with Aybee to validate color preferences before committing to production.

The Test: Real Parents, Real Decisions

Aybee designed a realistic product test environment with 1,000 qualified parents across Germany, carefully selected to match Naturbummler's target customer profile:

  • Parents with children aged 5-12
  • Active in outdoor hobbies
  • Main household decision-makers

All color variants were shown simultaneously in a realistic shopping context, and participants made selections under real-world conditions—just like an actual buying decision. The test tracked three critical objectives:

1.Measure overall and gender-specific color preferences

2.Track behavioral metrics like opening rate, buying interest, and conversion

3.Use this data to guide production priorities before launch

The Surprising Color Hierarchy

The results revealed dramatic differences in performance—far from the "all colors perform similarly" assumption:

🎯 Dark Blue: The Clear Winner

  • Generated 454% more purchase interest than Yellow when shown first
  • Top choice among boys with 92 selections
  • Consistently led to higher interaction and intent across all metrics

🔍 Purple: The Attention Trap

  • Leading choice for girls with 62 selections
  • Attracted attention but failed to convert at the same rate
  • Highlighted the critical gap between visual appeal and actual purchase behavior

🟡 Yellow: The Underperformer

  • Consistently underperformed across all metrics
  • Warm/secondary tones failed to resonate with the target audience
  • Would have been a costly production mistake if manufactured at scale

The Psychology Behind the Preferences

Aybee's analysis uncovered clear gender-specific patterns that would inform not just production, but future marketing strategy:

Gender-Specific Color Preferences:

  • Boys: Strong preference for Dark Blue (92 selections)
  • Girls: Leading preference for Purple (62 selections), though with weaker final conversion
  • Suggests the need for tailored positioning in future campaigns and product photography

Color as a Performance Lever:

  • Cool tones like Blue consistently led to higher interaction and purchase intent
  • Warm/secondary tones (e.g., Yellow) underperformed across all metrics
  • Color wasn't just aesthetic—it was a revenue driver

The Data-Driven Production Strategy

Armed with these insights, Naturbummler implemented a precise, risk-minimized production plan:

🟦 Prioritized Dark Blue & Light Blue

  • Allocated the majority of manufacturing capacity to proven high-performers
  • Ensured sufficient inventory to meet strong demand
  • Maximized revenue potential from launch day

🟣 Maintained Purple/Pink Inventory

  • Produced targeted quantities for the female demographic
  • Balanced appeal with conversion reality
  • Avoided overproduction based on attention alone

🟡 Reduced Yellow Production

  • Minimized or eliminated Yellow from initial production runs
  • Avoided tying up capital in slow-moving inventory
  • Freed up resources for high-performing variants

The Impact: Test Before You Invest

By validating color preferences before production, Naturbummler achieved:

  • Up to 454% revenue potential by prioritizing the right colors
  • Reduced inventory risk by avoiding low-performing variants
  • Optimized production allocation aligned with real market demand
  • Clear understanding of gender-specific preferences for future campaigns
  • Maximum alignment between market interest and production output

The approach transformed a high-risk production decision into a data-backed certainty.

As Naturbummler's team reflected:

"With Aybee's help, we didn't guess—we knew which colors to produce."

And in a separate statement:

"Our test with Aybee revealed which colors truly resonate with parents. Based on real behavioral insights, we prioritized the top-performing colors for production—and saw outstanding business results."

Why This Matters

This case study demonstrates a critical truth in product development: assumptions about preferences can cost you millions in inventory mistakes. What seems like a simple aesthetic choice—color—can actually be a massive performance lever when validated with real customer behavior.

Aybee's pre-production simulations allow brands to:

  • Test product variants before committing to manufacturing—eliminating costly guesswork
  • Identify performance gaps between visual appeal and actual conversion
  • Understand demographic preferences to inform both production and marketing
  • Optimize inventory allocation to maximize revenue and minimize risk
  • Launch with confidence, knowing exactly what the market wants

Curious how your product variants would perform?

With Aybee, test colors, features, or designs in a real buyer environment—before you invest in production.

Validate before you manufacture. Optimize before you launch.