Background
Venice Body, a renowned brand in the skincare market, sought assistance from Aybee to boost sales by optimizing the pricing strategy of their best-seller product, “Self-Tan Drops.”
The primary objective was to identify the optimal price point among three options: the current price of 35.99€, a lower price of 24.99€, and an intermediate price of 32.99€. Additionally,Venice Body aimed to enhance the perceived value and competitive edge of their product against top competitors.
Übrigens: Alles rund um Marktforschung auf einen Blick gibt es in unserem Marktforschung ABC
Business Questions
- Should Venice Body decrease the price from 35.99€ to 24.99€ or 32.99€
- How can Venice Body improve their product to increase sales?
- How does Venice Body’s product compare to the main competitors?
Methodology
Aybee did a pricing test with three prices: 35.99€, 24.99€, and 32.99€. This test was done using a monadic method, meaning each person only saw one price to keep it fair. Here’s how it worked:
- 600 people took part, with 200 people seeing each price.
- Each person was shown just one price to avoid any bias.
- This helped us see how different prices affect what people decide to buy.
By using this method, we got clear results about which price people liked best.

Results
The analysis revealed that maintaining the price at 35.99€ generated the highest revenue.Lowering the price did not lead to increased sales volume sufficient to compensate for the lower price, indicating that consumers valued the product’s quality at the higher price point.
Detailed Insights and Recommendations
From the test results, it became evident that a price reduction was not the optimal strategy.Instead, the focus should be on reinforcing the product’s superiority to justify its premium pricing. Here are the detailed insights and recommendations:
- Product Superiority - Consumers value the quality of Venice Body’s “Hyaluronic Self-Tan Drops,” noting its low margin of side effects, premium packaging, key benefits, and ease of integration with daily skincare routines. The product’s unique formulation with hyaluronic acid and its dual benefits of self-tanning and anti-aging make it stand out in the market.
- Marketing Communication - Emphasizing the anti-aging benefits and hyaluronic acid content in marketing materials can further enhance perceived value. Highlighting these aspects in the primary and secondary images can effectively communicate the product’s superiority.
- Visual Strategy - Venice Body has already initiated a change by updating the primary image to emphasize the anti-aging effect using a magnifying effect on the packaging. This strategy should be extended to include redesigned secondary images to showcase the ease of mixing the product with daily skincare routines and to highlight the product’s key benefits.
- Competitive Positioning - To strengthen competitive positioning, Venice Body can draw inspiration from competitors like Asam and Garnier, who effectively communicate product benefits through visual strategies. Through our test environment, we know the drivers and barriers for each competitive product. Weal ways know why consumers buy brand A, B, or C. Using this knowledge, Venice Body can refine their messaging and marketing strategies to better compete in the market.
ROI Case for Venice Body
Background
In the first week of May, Venice Body collaborated with Aybee to conduct a pricing A/B/C test and implement recommended changes to their product’s primary and secondary images. The aim was to optimize the pricing strategy and enhance the perceived value of their best-selling “Hyaluronic Self-Tan Drops.” This case study evaluates the return on investment (ROI) resulting from these interventions.
Investment and Costs
- Total cost: 3.000€
Revenue Analysis
- Revenue in March & April (Before the test): 52,252€
- Revenue in June & July (After the test): 67,400€
The implementation of the recommended changes resulted in an increase of 15,148€ in revenue over the two months following the changes.
By investing 3.000€ in a pricing test and implementing strategic changes to their product images, Venice Body achieved a significant increase in revenue, resulting in an ROI of 405%within 2 months. This clearly demonstrates the value of the test and the effectiveness of Aybee’s recommendations in driving sales and enhancing the product’s market performance.
The success of this case study highlights the importance of continuous optimization and strategic marketing in achieving business goals. Venice Body’s collaboration with Aybee notonly optimized their pricing strategy but also provided valuable insights into consumer behavior and market positioning. This approach can serve as a blueprint for other companies looking to enhance their market performance and achieve high returns on investment.
🏔️ CHALLENGE
A leading global coffee brand faced a critical strategic question: does launching a new product line generate incremental revenue, or does it risk cannibalizing existing products in the same category?
♟️ CLIENT'S HYPOTHESIS
The client believed that launching the new product line would likely cannibalize a significant portion of their existing product's revenue, potentially making the expansion a zero-sum game.
💰 AYBEE TEST RESULTS
The data revealed clear incremental growth with no self-cannibalization. The new product line captured market share from competitors, not from the brand's own products. Revenue increased by 72%, driven by strong demand for larger packs and expanded choice.
📊 ACTION POINTS:
Launch the new product line with confidence. The test confirmed that expansion would drive incremental growth, not cannibalization. Additionally, consider introducing larger packaging formats and refining packaging design to address consumer feedback on pricing perception and visual appeal.
✅ OUTCOME:
We helped one of the world's leading coffee brands unlock a 72% revenue increase by proving that expansion was a growth opportunity, not a cannibalization risk. The launch succeeded in capturing market share from competitors while strengthening the brand's portfolio.
Key Details
- Client: Leading Global Coffee Brand (via BOI - Board of Innovation)
- Industry: Coffee / FMCGMarket: Amazon
- Use Case: New Product Line Launch - Cannibalization Testing
- Participants: 1,000 participants across two scenariosConfidence Level: 99%
The Full Story
The Expansion Dilemma
BOI (Board of Innovation), a consultancy and technology company specializing in autonomous innovation, collaborated with Aybee to assist one of their clients—a leading global coffee brand—in evaluating a high-stakes strategic decision.
The brand wanted to expand into a new product category on Amazon by launching two new product lines (each consisting of 3 products). The potential upside was significant: capturing new market share, offering customers more choice, and driving revenue growth. But the risk was equally substantial: what if the new products simply stole sales from their existing lineup?
At the time of testing, the client had no products in this category on the market, making this a pure expansion play. The critical question was whether launching both product lines would deliver incremental growth or merely redistribute existing revenue through self-cannibalization.
Before committing to production, distribution, and marketing investment, the brand partnered with Aybee to test the strategy in a realistic buying environment.

The Test: Incremental Growth vs. Cannibalization
Aybee designed a realistic Amazon simulation with 1,000 participants, equally divided into two scenarios:
Scenario 1: Limited Portfolio
- Featured 7 products total
- 3 new products from the coffee brand
- 4 products from competitors
- This represented a conservative launch strategy with one product line
Scenario 2: Expanded Portfolio
- Featured 10 products total
- All products from Scenario 1 (3 from the brand + 4 from competitors)
- Plus 3 additional new products from the coffee brand (the second product line)
- This represented the full expansion strategy with both product lines
Participants browsed the simulated Amazon environment, interacted with product listings, and made purchase decisions just as they would in real life. They could select a product or indicate they weren't interested in any option. Aybee tracked all purchasing behavior, content interaction, and user journeys, then collected qualitative feedback through open-ended questions to understand the drivers and barriers behind each decision.
The Clear Verdict: Growth, Not Cannibalization
The results delivered a definitive answer with 99% confidence:
Scenario 1 Performance:
- 106 products sold
- 42% revenue share for the brand
Scenario 2 Performance:
- 172 products sold (+62 more units)
- 123 from the original 3 products
- 49 from the new 3 products
- 65% revenue share for the brand (+23 percentage points)
- 44% from the original products
- 21% from the new products
The expansion drove a 72% revenue increase compared to the limited portfolio approach. Critically, this growth was not driven by self-cannibalization—the original 3 products actually sold more units in Scenario 2 (123) than in Scenario 1 (106).
Where did the growth come from? Market share gains from the two largest competitors. The expanded portfolio gave customers more reasons to choose the brand over competitors, and some buyers who weren't interested in Scenario 1 found options they liked in Scenario 2.
The Strategic Insights
Beyond proving the business case for expansion, Aybee's analysis uncovered four critical insights to optimize the launch:
- Product Portfolio Expansion Works (99% confidence)
- Adding the second product line significantly increased revenue and market share
- Consumers responded positively to the expanded range, indicating strong interest in the new offerings
- The brand should continue exploring product expansion strategies to capture even more market share
- Strong Demand for Larger Packaging
- In Scenario 1, one of the existing products achieved over 40% brand share, making it the best-performing product among those tested
- The consistently high number of units purchased per consumer suggested strong demand for larger packaging formats
- The coffee brand should consider introducing larger formats to meet this demand and boost sales
- Price and Packaging Posed Barriers
- Despite a lower price per serving, many consumers still found the out-of-pocket price too high for the new products
- Additionally, the current packaging design for certain variants was seen as unattractive and busy
- The brand should refine packaging design to make it more appealing and simpler, while addressing pricing perception through targeted messaging about value for money
- Flavors as a Strong Purchase Driver
- Across all tested flavors, specific flavors received highly positive feedback, with many praising the taste as a key reason for purchase
- Flavor innovation plays a significant role in driving product success
- The coffee brand should continue exploring new and unique flavors to capitalize on this trend and attract a wider range of consumers
The Launch Decision
Armed with statistically significant proof that expansion would drive growth—not cannibalization—the brand made the decision to launch the new product line.
The test eliminated the strategic uncertainty and de-risked the investment. Instead of guessing whether the expansion would work, they knew it would deliver a 72% revenue increase with 99% confidence.
The Impact
By testing before launching, the coffee brand achieved:
- 72% revenue increase through portfolio expansion
- Market share gains from competitors, not self-cannibalization
- Proof of incremental growth with 99% statistical confidence
- Actionable insights on packaging, pricing perception, and flavor innovation
- De-risked expansion strategy backed by real customer behavior
The approach transformed a high-risk strategic decision into a data-backed certainty, allowing the brand to invest confidently in production, distribution, and marketing.
As the results demonstrate, the fear of cannibalization—while understandable—was unfounded. The real opportunity was capturing competitor market share through expanded choice and superior offerings.
Why This Matters
This case study demonstrates a critical truth in portfolio strategy: expansion fears are often based on assumptions, not data. Brands frequently avoid launching new products because they fear cannibalizing existing sales, but the real risk is often leaving revenue on the table by not expanding.
Aybee's cannibalization testing allows brands to:
- Test expansion strategies before committing to production—eliminating costly guesswork
- Distinguish between incremental growth and self-cannibalization with statistical confidence
- Understand where new revenue comes from—competitors, new buyers, or existing products
- Identify optimization opportunities for packaging, pricing, and positioning
- Make bold strategic decisions backed by real customer behavior, not assumptions
Curious whether your expansion will cannibalize or grow?
With Aybee, test new product lines, formats, or categories in a real buyer environment—before you invest in production or distribution.
Validate before you launch. Expand with confidence.
.png)




